<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ecosystems, Plants &amp; Animals on the Move, but Fast Enough?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/12/29/ecosystems-plants-animals-on-the-move-but-fast-enough/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/12/29/ecosystems-plants-animals-on-the-move-but-fast-enough/</link>
	<description>News &#38; commentary on sustainability, activism, urban planning, politics, and our world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:32:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael R.</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/12/29/ecosystems-plants-animals-on-the-move-but-fast-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-57865</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/?p=5268#comment-57865</guid>
		<description>It is more a movement in &#039;time&#039;, more than in &#039;space&#039;...interesting,; we don&#039;t always think about ecosystems this way...

...regarding this statement: &quot;92% of currently protected areas set up to preserve biodiversity are not expected to be the same ecosystem in 100 years time.&quot;

...it is both a startling number, and, at the same time, to be expected....evolution in general--and the evolution of ecosystems specifically--is a product of dynamic and often complext interactions between flora, fauna, and forces of Nature....

...what would be important to know here is how this projected rate of change compares to &quot;control&quot; ecosystems--those not subjected to climate forcing, as many are today. And, also, what the bio-diversity &#039;rating&#039; (high or low) would be for these slower moving/changing ecosystems in 100 years time, etc.

Thanks for this post on an over-looked aspect of Nature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is more a movement in &#8216;time&#8217;, more than in &#8216;space&#8217;&#8230;interesting,; we don&#8217;t always think about ecosystems this way&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;regarding this statement: &#8220;92% of currently protected areas set up to preserve biodiversity are not expected to be the same ecosystem in 100 years time.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;it is both a startling number, and, at the same time, to be expected&#8230;.evolution in general&#8211;and the evolution of ecosystems specifically&#8211;is a product of dynamic and often complext interactions between flora, fauna, and forces of Nature&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8230;what would be important to know here is how this projected rate of change compares to &#8220;control&#8221; ecosystems&#8211;those not subjected to climate forcing, as many are today. And, also, what the bio-diversity &#8216;rating&#8217; (high or low) would be for these slower moving/changing ecosystems in 100 years time, etc.</p>
<p>Thanks for this post on an over-looked aspect of Nature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

