<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thank You, &amp; Copenhagen Conclusions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/12/19/thank-you-copenhagen-conclusions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/12/19/thank-you-copenhagen-conclusions/</link>
	<description>News &#38; commentary on sustainability, activism, urban planning, politics, and our world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:32:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Croft</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/12/19/thank-you-copenhagen-conclusions/comment-page-1/#comment-57858</link>
		<dc:creator>William Croft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 00:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/?p=5192#comment-57858</guid>
		<description>A few days after this blog post, Mark Lynas wrote what is perhaps the KEY article on what really happened behind closed doors at Copenhagen:  China sabotaged the binding reduction agreement.  Over the strenuous objections of Obama and the rest of the developed nations.  Truely amazes me that this story is still underreported.  China got away with murder, literally...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/22/copenhagen-climate-change-mark-lynas

How do I know China wrecked the Copenhagen deal? I was in the room

As recriminations fly post-Copenhagen, one writer offers a fly-on-the-wall account of how talks failed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few days after this blog post, Mark Lynas wrote what is perhaps the KEY article on what really happened behind closed doors at Copenhagen:  China sabotaged the binding reduction agreement.  Over the strenuous objections of Obama and the rest of the developed nations.  Truely amazes me that this story is still underreported.  China got away with murder, literally&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/22/copenhagen-climate-change-mark-lynas" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/22/copenhagen-climate-change-mark-lynas</a></p>
<p>How do I know China wrecked the Copenhagen deal? I was in the room</p>
<p>As recriminations fly post-Copenhagen, one writer offers a fly-on-the-wall account of how talks failed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Ciofalo</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/12/19/thank-you-copenhagen-conclusions/comment-page-1/#comment-57856</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Ciofalo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 02:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/?p=5192#comment-57856</guid>
		<description>I urge you to get the facts straight---99% of your report is wrong, do you work for some big corporation?

Go to www.democracynow.com and listen to the last eleven days of reporting live from Copenhagen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I urge you to get the facts straight&#8212;99% of your report is wrong, do you work for some big corporation?</p>
<p>Go to <a href="http://www.democracynow.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.democracynow.com</a> and listen to the last eleven days of reporting live from Copenhagen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bro. Don R. White</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/12/19/thank-you-copenhagen-conclusions/comment-page-1/#comment-57857</link>
		<dc:creator>Bro. Don R. White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/?p=5192#comment-57857</guid>
		<description>What about CLIMATE-GATE? Has the U.K. CRU Climate Change Scientists been exonerated with their reputations intact? Why would FIA Email documents even need to hacked? Something is rotten in Denmark. Peer Review has been exposed as fraudulent, biased, with vested interests and affiliations. Are you not simply Buffoons at best or more likely common criminals ripping off the world and having not a wit&#039;s worth of empathy for the poor? Isn&#039;t there large percentage of errors in the Climate Change Hoaxer&#039;s computer models? Just asking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about CLIMATE-GATE? Has the U.K. CRU Climate Change Scientists been exonerated with their reputations intact? Why would FIA Email documents even need to hacked? Something is rotten in Denmark. Peer Review has been exposed as fraudulent, biased, with vested interests and affiliations. Are you not simply Buffoons at best or more likely common criminals ripping off the world and having not a wit&#8217;s worth of empathy for the poor? Isn&#8217;t there large percentage of errors in the Climate Change Hoaxer&#8217;s computer models? Just asking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

