<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alaska Vows To Fight Polar Bear Protection With Lawsuits, Disses Climate Change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/10/23/alaska-vows-to-fight-polar-bear-protection-with-lawsuits-disses-climate-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/10/23/alaska-vows-to-fight-polar-bear-protection-with-lawsuits-disses-climate-change/</link>
	<description>News &#38; commentary on sustainability, activism, urban planning, politics, and our world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 16:38:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cook Inlet Beluga Whales: 3,000 Square Miles of Critical Habitat Proposed : EcoWorldly</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/10/23/alaska-vows-to-fight-polar-bear-protection-with-lawsuits-disses-climate-change/comment-page-1/#comment-62694</link>
		<dc:creator>Cook Inlet Beluga Whales: 3,000 Square Miles of Critical Habitat Proposed : EcoWorldly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/?p=4458#comment-62694</guid>
		<description>[...] current governor, Sean Parnell, appears to harbor the same disdain for the environment, vowing to fight proposed polar bear protections. He claims that designating critical habitat for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] current governor, Sean Parnell, appears to harbor the same disdain for the environment, vowing to fight proposed polar bear protections. He claims that designating critical habitat for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhishja Larson</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/10/23/alaska-vows-to-fight-polar-bear-protection-with-lawsuits-disses-climate-change/comment-page-1/#comment-62696</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhishja Larson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/?p=4458#comment-62696</guid>
		<description>Eric -

Thank you for your question. Endangered species protections are not only for existing populations, but to ensure that these animals have a future.

There is detailed information about classification criteria on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species website at http://www.iucnredlist.org/

- - Rhishja</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric -</p>
<p>Thank you for your question. Endangered species protections are not only for existing populations, but to ensure that these animals have a future.</p>
<p>There is detailed information about classification criteria on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species website at <a href="http://www.iucnredlist.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.iucnredlist.org/</a></p>
<p>- &#8211; Rhishja</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/10/23/alaska-vows-to-fight-polar-bear-protection-with-lawsuits-disses-climate-change/comment-page-1/#comment-62695</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/?p=4458#comment-62695</guid>
		<description>It is my understanding that the polar bear population is currently at its highest recorded level, or somewhere around 20,000 bears.  This is up from somewhere around 13,000 bears in the 1960&#039;s-1970&#039;s.

Why would we need to place them on the endangered species list if this is the case?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is my understanding that the polar bear population is currently at its highest recorded level, or somewhere around 20,000 bears.  This is up from somewhere around 13,000 bears in the 1960&#8242;s-1970&#8242;s.</p>
<p>Why would we need to place them on the endangered species list if this is the case?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

