<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ISO Efficient Bioenergy: Ethanol Verses Bioelectricity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/08/04/iso-bioenergy-ethanol-verses-bioelectricity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/08/04/iso-bioenergy-ethanol-verses-bioelectricity/</link>
	<description>News &#38; commentary on sustainability, activism, urban planning, politics, and our world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:32:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8216;Woody&#8217; Biomass Breakthrough: Fungus is the Key : Planetsave</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/08/04/iso-bioenergy-ethanol-verses-bioelectricity/comment-page-1/#comment-124976</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8216;Woody&#8217; Biomass Breakthrough: Fungus is the Key : Planetsave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 19:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/?p=3441#comment-124976</guid>
		<description>[...] A forest is far more useful&#8211;in terms of &#8216;ecosystem services&#8211;as a carbon sink, than as a fuel source. Also, biomass conversion to electricity (bioelectricity) is significantly more efficient than its conversion to liquid fuel (see my older, ecolocalizer article: ISO Efficient Bioenergy: Ethanol vs. Bioelectricity) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A forest is far more useful&#8211;in terms of &#8216;ecosystem services&#8211;as a carbon sink, than as a fuel source. Also, biomass conversion to electricity (bioelectricity) is significantly more efficient than its conversion to liquid fuel (see my older, ecolocalizer article: ISO Efficient Bioenergy: Ethanol vs. Bioelectricity) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sirroman</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/08/04/iso-bioenergy-ethanol-verses-bioelectricity/comment-page-1/#comment-61642</link>
		<dc:creator>Sirroman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/?p=3441#comment-61642</guid>
		<description>The problem of electricity: to &quot;show an average of 81% more transportation kilometers and 108 %  more GHG offsets&quot; 100% of the country&#039;s energy should come from bioelectricity. That&#039;s impratical, inefficient and would be disastrous. How the electricity powered cars are compared to ethanol-powered ones when we account Coal energy? Will this bioelectricity be cheaper then Coal?

Besides, everybody with common sense already knows that corn isn&#039;t the way to go. Corn isn&#039;t &quot;less sustainable&quot;, it&#039;s &quot;unsustainable&quot;.

I still believe energy is the future, but only when our energy-grid is clean *and* cheap, otherwise we are just blindfolding ourselves. Everybody, let&#039;s cross our fingers  and pray that General Fusion (Vancouver, Canada) is successful in their new fusion power plant! (http://thefutureofthings.com/headline/7650/a-new-approach-to-fusion.html)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem of electricity: to &#8220;show an average of 81% more transportation kilometers and 108 %  more GHG offsets&#8221; 100% of the country&#8217;s energy should come from bioelectricity. That&#8217;s impratical, inefficient and would be disastrous. How the electricity powered cars are compared to ethanol-powered ones when we account Coal energy? Will this bioelectricity be cheaper then Coal?</p>
<p>Besides, everybody with common sense already knows that corn isn&#8217;t the way to go. Corn isn&#8217;t &#8220;less sustainable&#8221;, it&#8217;s &#8220;unsustainable&#8221;.</p>
<p>I still believe energy is the future, but only when our energy-grid is clean *and* cheap, otherwise we are just blindfolding ourselves. Everybody, let&#8217;s cross our fingers  and pray that General Fusion (Vancouver, Canada) is successful in their new fusion power plant! (<a href="http://thefutureofthings.com/headline/7650/a-new-approach-to-fusion.html" rel="nofollow">http://thefutureofthings.com/headline/7650/a-new-approach-to-fusion.html</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

