<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Italian Wind Farms, Golden Eagle Under Threat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/07/31/italian-wind-farms-golden-eagle-under-threat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/07/31/italian-wind-farms-golden-eagle-under-threat/</link>
	<description>News &#38; commentary on sustainability, activism, urban planning, politics, and our world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:32:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: krissy</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/07/31/italian-wind-farms-golden-eagle-under-threat/comment-page-1/#comment-58057</link>
		<dc:creator>krissy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/?p=3453#comment-58057</guid>
		<description>That worries me because Texas has the most windpower and the largest number of bird species. I think wind farms are pretty icky and we should shift to localized energy production.  You can have solar, a small wind turbine like in the olden days, biodiesel or bio gas digesters.  Large industrial power facilities are the problem. I bet we&#039;ll be hearing about those large solar panels in the desert real soon.  They create large scale problems and require that much more energy just to get it to the consumer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That worries me because Texas has the most windpower and the largest number of bird species. I think wind farms are pretty icky and we should shift to localized energy production.  You can have solar, a small wind turbine like in the olden days, biodiesel or bio gas digesters.  Large industrial power facilities are the problem. I bet we&#8217;ll be hearing about those large solar panels in the desert real soon.  They create large scale problems and require that much more energy just to get it to the consumer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerard Vaughan</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/07/31/italian-wind-farms-golden-eagle-under-threat/comment-page-1/#comment-58056</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerard Vaughan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 16:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/?p=3453#comment-58056</guid>
		<description>Yes, &quot;Windfarming&quot; CAN work, but to do so it needs to be about 40 times (not twice) as effective as current &quot;technology&quot; which returns only a SMALL fraction of One percent off its cost - i.e. the energy required to replace it - each year.
    You may be aware that I have been trying not to rant, too ravingly, about this for some years now.  Maybe the message is getting through at last.  A Vestas factory is closing, and the workforce are &quot;sitting-in&quot; I read.
    According to some, it seems that getting energy from the wind is simple once you have made the huge decision &quot;Shall we have it Vertical or Horizontal&quot;.
The rest they appear to think is just &quot;une fait accomplie&quot;.  It isn&#039;t !
    If you email me an address I can send my &quot;wind info&quot; to which I refered, with photo of Turbine-Alternator device - TAD ? - which shows a return of around 5% p.a. and is therefore capable of providing the energy to replace it long before it needs to be rerplaced.  Growth is therefore possible from WIND energy - not other sources !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    As you will see it presents absolutely no threat to any wildlife save that bent on self-destruction.
(Like mankind ?)
         Kind regards
               G. bert Vaughan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, &#8220;Windfarming&#8221; CAN work, but to do so it needs to be about 40 times (not twice) as effective as current &#8220;technology&#8221; which returns only a SMALL fraction of One percent off its cost &#8211; i.e. the energy required to replace it &#8211; each year.<br />
    You may be aware that I have been trying not to rant, too ravingly, about this for some years now.  Maybe the message is getting through at last.  A Vestas factory is closing, and the workforce are &#8220;sitting-in&#8221; I read.<br />
    According to some, it seems that getting energy from the wind is simple once you have made the huge decision &#8220;Shall we have it Vertical or Horizontal&#8221;.<br />
The rest they appear to think is just &#8220;une fait accomplie&#8221;.  It isn&#8217;t !<br />
    If you email me an address I can send my &#8220;wind info&#8221; to which I refered, with photo of Turbine-Alternator device &#8211; TAD ? &#8211; which shows a return of around 5% p.a. and is therefore capable of providing the energy to replace it long before it needs to be rerplaced.  Growth is therefore possible from WIND energy &#8211; not other sources !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br />
    As you will see it presents absolutely no threat to any wildlife save that bent on self-destruction.<br />
(Like mankind ?)<br />
         Kind regards<br />
               G. bert Vaughan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: offset</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/07/31/italian-wind-farms-golden-eagle-under-threat/comment-page-1/#comment-58055</link>
		<dc:creator>offset</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/?p=3453#comment-58055</guid>
		<description>Support FREE exchange of carbon offsets! Say no to cap and trade!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Support FREE exchange of carbon offsets! Say no to cap and trade!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

