<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Save Amazon With Nuke Waste, Says Environmentalist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/07/27/save-amazon-with-nuke-waste-says-environmentalist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/07/27/save-amazon-with-nuke-waste-says-environmentalist/</link>
	<description>News &#38; commentary on sustainability, activism, urban planning, politics, and our world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:32:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rem Koolhaas&#8217;: &#8216;Advancement versus Apocalypse&#8217; via SustainableCitiesCollective &#124; Urban Choreography</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/07/27/save-amazon-with-nuke-waste-says-environmentalist/comment-page-1/#comment-239811</link>
		<dc:creator>Rem Koolhaas&#8217;: &#8216;Advancement versus Apocalypse&#8217; via SustainableCitiesCollective &#124; Urban Choreography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/?p=3316#comment-239811</guid>
		<description>[...] :: Amazon Burning &#8211; image via Ecolizer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] :: Amazon Burning &#8211; image via Ecolizer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrueEyes</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/07/27/save-amazon-with-nuke-waste-says-environmentalist/comment-page-1/#comment-61098</link>
		<dc:creator>TrueEyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 13:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/?p=3316#comment-61098</guid>
		<description>Just like almost every environmentalist, you are completely misguided about nuclear energy.
The quantity of radioactive waste from nuclear plants is very very very little. According to wiki a large plant makes about 2 square meters of waste per year, so in order to fill just your room with nuclear waste, a plant would need more than 20 years. I don&#039;t see how this could scale to the size of the amazon.
On the other hand, all nuclear waste is safely contained in concrete so nothing gets contaminated. To spill it out in the open would be completely irresponsible and very dangerous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just like almost every environmentalist, you are completely misguided about nuclear energy.<br />
The quantity of radioactive waste from nuclear plants is very very very little. According to wiki a large plant makes about 2 square meters of waste per year, so in order to fill just your room with nuclear waste, a plant would need more than 20 years. I don&#8217;t see how this could scale to the size of the amazon.<br />
On the other hand, all nuclear waste is safely contained in concrete so nothing gets contaminated. To spill it out in the open would be completely irresponsible and very dangerous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/07/27/save-amazon-with-nuke-waste-says-environmentalist/comment-page-1/#comment-61099</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 03:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/?p=3316#comment-61099</guid>
		<description>Thinking out side the box is great! some one figured out the problem and found a solution to it. None of this wishy washy political BS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thinking out side the box is great! some one figured out the problem and found a solution to it. None of this wishy washy political BS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RadMan</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/07/27/save-amazon-with-nuke-waste-says-environmentalist/comment-page-1/#comment-61095</link>
		<dc:creator>RadMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/?p=3316#comment-61095</guid>
		<description>I hope this idea is presented tongue in cheek. It certainly is true that having a nuclear dump site would keep most people away, but the zone of consequence would be too small to be of much help for the vast rain forests of the Amazon.

More importantly, Lovelock is incorrect if he asserts that numbers of plants and animals are higher within the Chernobyl-affected regions of Ukraine and Belarus - all scientific evidence suggests that most organisms that have been surveyed are negatively affected with lower abundances and biodiversity. See recent scientific publications by Anders Moller and Timothy Mousseau for some information on birds and insects.  There is a very limited amount of data that directly demonstrates shortened lifespans. I have only seen such data for barn swallows, also published by Moller and Mousseau et al. But perhaps the best data in support of shortened life spans comes from the life expectancies observed by humans in these areas published by WHO.

Thus the proposition of creating a nuclear dump site in the Amazon must be completely tongue in cheek as it is fallacious on all fronts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope this idea is presented tongue in cheek. It certainly is true that having a nuclear dump site would keep most people away, but the zone of consequence would be too small to be of much help for the vast rain forests of the Amazon.</p>
<p>More importantly, Lovelock is incorrect if he asserts that numbers of plants and animals are higher within the Chernobyl-affected regions of Ukraine and Belarus &#8211; all scientific evidence suggests that most organisms that have been surveyed are negatively affected with lower abundances and biodiversity. See recent scientific publications by Anders Moller and Timothy Mousseau for some information on birds and insects.  There is a very limited amount of data that directly demonstrates shortened lifespans. I have only seen such data for barn swallows, also published by Moller and Mousseau et al. But perhaps the best data in support of shortened life spans comes from the life expectancies observed by humans in these areas published by WHO.</p>
<p>Thus the proposition of creating a nuclear dump site in the Amazon must be completely tongue in cheek as it is fallacious on all fronts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: krissy</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/07/27/save-amazon-with-nuke-waste-says-environmentalist/comment-page-1/#comment-61097</link>
		<dc:creator>krissy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/?p=3316#comment-61097</guid>
		<description>That is not cool. People live there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is not cool. People live there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/07/27/save-amazon-with-nuke-waste-says-environmentalist/comment-page-1/#comment-61096</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 02:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/?p=3316#comment-61096</guid>
		<description>Evidently this man has NEVER seen Godzilla.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evidently this man has NEVER seen Godzilla.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

