Giant Spiders Could Be a Result of Global Warming
Scientists studying northeastern Greenland’s hairy, meat-eating wolf spiders have discovered every arachnophobe’s worst nightmare.
It appears that as the Earth has been warming and summers have been getting longer, the 8-legged hunters have been steadily growing larger and more numerous. And it’s likely that other creepy-crawly species around the world could be growing larger too.
The species that was studied, Pardosa glacialis, can grow to as long as 1.6 inches. For now. But the study revealed that the average size of the spiders had grown by 2% over the last ten years. That’s a significant growth rate, according to researchers.
The precise cause of the trend is still a mystery, but the growth was strongly correlated with hotter, longer summers. For instance, in years when spring came 30 days earlier, many spiders grew exoskeletons which were 10% thicker than usual. Translated for the squeamish: that means the spiders were bigger, hairier and more difficult to squash.
And they aren’t just getting larger, they’re increasing their numbers too. The study also discovered that most of the species growth happened among females. Since larger females tend to produce more offspring, that means more spiders overall.
Scientists speculate that the reasons for the enlarged, more populous arachnids may have to do with an extended hunting season. Their prime hunting season occurs during the summer months, and the longer warm period means more time to feast. Another hypothesis could be that the extended summers allow the spiders to molt more often.
More research needs to be conducted to determine if the spiders are actually being born larger. If so, then the trend could be evolutionary rather than just seasonal.
Whatever the cause, the news highlights how many of the effects of global warming could be unexpected, and it’s not yet clear how the larger, more numerous spiders could effect local ecosystems. Or human psychology, for that matter.
Source: Nationalgeographic.com
Image Credit: xoque at Flickr under a Creative Commons License
If what you’re saying is true, then the 2% of growth – in the past 10 years – can not be due to higher global temperatures. Global temperatures stopped rising in 1998.
[...] Giant Spiders Could Be a Result of Global Warming : EcoWorldly. [...]
Oh BS. This whole “Global Warming” talk is crap.
[...] Read More Here Tagged with: Global Warming Spiders [...]
Or, giant spiders could be a result of taking pictures of the spiders close up. Also, Why Are You Capitalizing Every Word Of The Title Of The Story? It doesn’t make the spiders any bigger. Sensationalist reporting at its finest.
effect —> affect
Josh,
Unfortunately, you’re propagating false information that has been spread throughout the internet by global warming deniers. In reality, the decade between 1998 and 2007 was the hottest on record– that according to the WMO– World Meteorological Organization.
There have been conficting reports about whether 1998 was the hottest year, or 2005 was. Regardless, they were both hot. Global Warming doesn’t mean that temperatures go up consistently every year. Rather, you have to look at overall trends. For instance, 2008 was a La Nina year, so it was cooler than 2007– but 2008 was still the 12th hottest year on record, despite that.
The false data you are promoting is based on the following shady rationale: if 1998 was the hottest year on record, then every year since then has been cooler– thus the Earth must be cooling. When in fact, it doesn’t take into consideration overall trends and averages, which would indicate that the whole decade was hotter than the last, even though the hottest year may have been– may have been– 1998.
Those wolfspiders are nasty. We’ve seen them here in NC with 1 inch+ long bodies fangs to rear end, and they gallop. It’s awfully creepy to see a spider gallop.
poor scott tuttle. he’s hopping mad. they’re so unhinged by the liberal revolution that they deny the world’s getting hotter for any reason.
the right wing nut jobs have denied that there is any kind of global warming at all. now, I bet they’ll deny that their past blanket denials. (roll the video tapes please) hehehe
can’t deny it any longer so now they just deny human envolvement when we don’t know if their is or isn’t 100%. (just 95%)
so, they’re so deranged they spew and sputter that there’s no human component without that being an established fact.
who cares if I’m wrong and my grand children pay the price?
what kind of nut job thinks that way.
maybe we are involved. we don’t know yet. you’re willing to gamble the wellfare of your children’s children?
maybe you’ll luck out and they’ll be liberal democrats. if the burn so what. screw ‘em.
Do you also know that Earth goes through warming periods? It as throughout history. The Sun is the primary source of this heat. Other planets are also warming. I suppose that our Co2 emissions are also warming Mars?
1 inch is “giant”?? hmmm…..
Josh,
Yes, everyone knows that the Earth goes through cycles of warming and cooling. That includes all the world’s leading scientists and climatologists who, as part of the IPCC, took that into consideration and still concluded that human actions are contributing significantly to climate change.
WMO is the UN’s science puppet. their data and sources of data are becoming increasingly more suspect. it won’t be long before they’ll have to find someone else to whistle their own dogs in for supper.
so bryan heres nice graph for you http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/03/uah-global-temperature-dives-in-may/
and same site discussing the effcts the sun has on our weather http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/12/31/2008-ends-spotless-and-with-266-spotless-days-the-2-least-active-year-since-1900-portends-cooling/ and finaly heres a story from those rightwing nutjobs at Nat Geo saying as much http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/09/080924-solar-wind.html.
Philgorp,
WMO’s numbers regarding global temperatures are widely respected and far from suspect. Who is holding them suspect, exactly, and why?
As you have quoted, another trend among global warming deniers is to blame temperature fluctuations on the sun. Without a doubt, the sun plays a role in Earth’s climate. No one is denying this. But this is entirely irrelevant when trying to explain the extremely well-established link between climate and carbon emissions and the thickness of greenhouse gases in our atmosphere.
That correlation holds even taking into consideration a fluctuating sun.
This fact is even more apparent given that the articles you cited noted a weak sun in 2008. And yet, 2008 was measured as between the 10th-15th hottest year on record worldwide (http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-192354613.html). Keep in mind that this is also despite the fact that 2008 was a La Nina year.
So as an aside, I’m not sure what you’re implying here. Are you implying that, since the sun appears to be in a weaker phase, that it will offset the human-caused carbon pollution we’re emitting, so we can go right on ahead polluting?
That implication is awfully irresponsible.
Doubtless global warming also explains giant hairy elephants roaming North America 15,000 years ago. Oh, wait, that was a during an ice age. The biosphere always responds to long or even short-term fluctuations in conditions by changes in feeding ranges, migration patterns or a variety of other survival strategies. Try to stay calm. The next global cooling is on the doorstep, if not already here!
So as an aside, I’m not sure what you’re implying here. Are you implying that, since the sun appears to be in a weaker phase, that it will offset the human-caused carbon pollution we’re emitting, so we can go right on ahead polluting?
thats your own. you’re basing that observation on the assumption that i #1 aggree that humans are making this world warmer with co2 and #2 advocate the complete distruction of the environment. how you got that out of what i posted. is beyond a stretch.
anyway i seem to remember the scientist at nasa who’s data ipcc and wmo used for their studies, owning up to fudging oh right here it is. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/3563532/The-world-has-never-seen-such-freezing-heat.html
Remember when the ice age ended?
Yeah, loads of wooly mammoths drove around in 6 litre 4×4’s that’s why.
The earth goes through cycles, it isn’t man made global warming, it’s the earth doing what it’s always done.
Why did the ice age start? Did all the dinosaurs make sure their TV’s were not left on standby?
A general dumbing-down of the educational system which is necessary to promulgate Leftist and eco-anarcho religiosity combined with resultant politically correct intimidation by Eco Cranks is the worst plague Global Smarming has imposed on humanity.
Bryan, “statistics and damned lies!” as they say. It all depends on which data set you use. The NASA GISS US data NOW shows that the warmest decade was in fact the 1930s. The satellite data [both sets] shows a levelling off over the last 10 years with significant decrease last 2 years. Hansen ’s GISS data shows continuing warming over the rest of the world [averaged] but neglects to mention the 4000 weather stations in ex soviet Russia that are now closed[most of them were in siberia.] Also,the chinese data are suspect [ they give us beautiful data from the time of the cultural revolution !] and NASA GISS at Goddard will not divulge their algorythms [Al GoreRythms?] and corrections to anyone. I think the only trustworthy data is from the satellite data. And I agree with Josh.
Ian,
Actually, on the issue of global warming, it doesn’t depend upon which scientifically collected data set you use. One of the reasons there is such overwhelming scientific consensus around the issue of global warming is that the evidence is alarmingly clear. This isn’t statistical speculation or a numbers game.
Nonetheless, political propaganda doesn’t work under the same criteria of scrutiny as science does. And the point that you raise is a perfect example of this kind of political sophistry.
For instance, let’s take the corrected NASA GISS data and be clear about what it indicates. First of all, while it’s true that 1934 slightly edges out 1998 as the hottest year in the US according to the corrected data, the corrected difference in the mean between the two years, of 0.02 degrees Celsius, was and always had been smaller than the uncertainty. In other words, although their relative positions are now flipflopped, the change is statistically irrelevant.
Furthermore, this minor, statistically irrelevant deviation changes absolutely nothing concerning global temperature. 1934 was a hotter year in the U.S., but 1998 and 2005 were still the hottest years– by far– around the world. In other words, the NASA GISS correction was only relevant to rankings of temperatures within the US. The corrections made almost no difference to global temperature trends.
Although it may be true that NASA did not explain the significance of the changes very effectively and there are many who may be genuinely confused, the fact that many global warming deniers spread this news as if it was some sort of gigantic revelation can only be described as shamefully and deliberately manipulative.
This case, which you have brought up, is actually a startling example of how global warming deniers dogmatically attempt to politicize this issue. It’s clear that they have attached to these data sets in particular and asked themselves: “How can we twist this to prove global warming is fake?”
Further, NASA GISS has made all of the corrections public. There is no mysterious conspiracy to cover anything up. The NASA GISS corrections were a convenient tool for global warming deniers and sophists to try to spin, but the fact of the matter is that the changes made were statistically irrelevant and don’t change anything regarding the alarming global warming trend which has continued to spike throughout this century.
I’m so proud of everyone who does their own investigating and doesn’t just believe whatever they read. No matter what side you end up on, I think everyone should be able to defend their beliefs.
Long live the Internet.
I believe global warming is hyped up much like this “swine flu”. It’s totally not a big deal. But, if you let the media run with it, it’s a “human sacrifice dogs and cats living together mass hysteria!” kind of thing.
[...] photo：Mundo Poco [...]
i did’nt understan why do those animals cause global warming?
It seems earth is changing, not for our better tho, but for creatures. Perhaps mother nature wants to get rid of us. With all of mans tampering and experiments, its no surprise our climate is reverting back to eons ago.
It may be the monsters of Hollywood are not so much fiction now. I think we have many nasty surprises ahead of us. Im a scientist, trained in earth science and animals.
I have noted that some spiders have seemed larger over recent autumns, notably the tegenaria species. That’s not to say it’s global warming, nor is it to say anything other than I have happened to have coincidentally had some big spiders in my flat in recent years.
Weather patterns quite literally have ‘patterns’. And I doubt we have anything much to worry about.
I have, however, noticed unusually large pholcid spiders indoors, during summer (which I do find unusual). Mouse spiders are seemingly abundant this year too. I’ve also found the occasional woodlouse spider indoors this year too.
Maybe I’m looking out for these animals, as I’m a spider enthusiast, but I have to admit the last 18 months have been a spider lover’s wonderland!
It is no wonder, the great, lovable, once monogamous, and admirable family man, and high calorie intake, high sugar consuming, Hulking American Neanderthal, the product of a short 200 year evolution to his current, monumental size, – no bigger bones have been found!- balks at accepting the idea that he alone may causing even more damage to Mother Earth! It is an embarrassing state of affairs! His evolution, requiring the richest farmland on earth, and 80% of the world’s resources all these years, results in an unsustainable beast of grand proportion, strength, richest diet on earth, requiring 6 acres of good farmland for his beef consumption alone, and all the oil the OPEC nations, and the Saudis can ship, and still, not enough to satiate his great appetite! Sadly, however, he is in a losing battle against the faster, smaller, smarter, vegan Asian! This creature, in as little as the last few decades, has taken his “Smoke Stack Industries”, his “Manufacturer to the World” status, even his magnificent car industry, and his economy from him and now challenges his supplies of oil world wide with the “Yuan” a stable money form not manipulated, inflated or deflated, and becoming trusted in International Trade, and after his dishonest trading of bad bonds on the world scene, and his manipulation of the “fiat” dollar by government printing sprees, without material backing, thus devaluing the dollar worldwide, dishonest indeed, he stands to lose again as the “Yuan” replaces the American Dollar world-wide as currency of fair, honest, commerce. His scholastic ability has also come into question, with his own President admitting shamefully his schools rates 32nd in the world, no longer first place ! The Asians, especially the Chinese have championed scholastic achievement over sports such as foot ball, baseball, hockey, the intellect over brawn, and have more post graduates with IQ’s over 130, and Multi-lingual in most cases, and in the Sciences, Physics, Chemistry, Engineering to add to their prowess, than the Great hulking American Neanderthal has high-school students this year! India, a land of cricket players and vegan to the core, scores similarly against our Great Hulking Soda imbibing, meat eating high calorie intake American Neanderthal, and without large motor cars for each one of them either! His shrinking from responsibility where global warming is concerned and the denial game he plays is part of his innate personality deficit and explains his smoking habits, alcoholism, drug habits, psycho-consumerism, addiction to gasoline and the motor cars that drink it, and his materialistic, non communal ways also! Poor fellow, easily deluded, coerced, convinced, connived, and propagandized, even by his own spin-Meister corporatist advertising propagandists into accepting their wishes as his reason for living! Planned obsolescence in products for profits, annual model changes to churn profits, commissions, and even McMansions the ultimate sales job, as necessities for life, in face of sensible survival shelters from Canada and other social democracies that make more sense! As China builds Electric Bullet trains to interconnect their huge cities, and by passes the airplane follies for computerized travel interconnecting even downtown subways and trams, no great terminals necessary, the great hulking American Neanderthal stalls, holds out for “Better Times” and bigger faster V-8 engined cars to resolve his travel problems and this is so, even as his great GM(America) goes on welfare and to slowly sink away in failure and bankruptcy. Global Warming? How can he bear the blame for even one more folly? He stonewalls, retrogresses in denial, and I as one don’t blame him for how he feels!
[...] Invasione di ragni giganti: giant-spiders-could-be-a-result-of-global-warming [...]
hi,
I’m busy doing a school project, and my main focus is spiders. I do not agree with your theory; those spiders could have been around for millions of years, and just not noticed, and now, because of global warming, have been brought out their natural habitat. Or,(just a guess, I have no real idea if this is correct…) have been forced to cross-breed, because their habitat is changing.
Thanks for this very interesting subject, and cool wolf spider pic…
bye!
Publications and titles therein usually have capital letters at the beginning of their words.