<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oldest Living Creature Discovered at 4,265 Years Old</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/26/oldest-living-creature-discovered-at-4265-years-old/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/26/oldest-living-creature-discovered-at-4265-years-old/</link>
	<description>News &#38; commentary on sustainability, activism, urban planning, politics, and our world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 16:38:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/26/oldest-living-creature-discovered-at-4265-years-old/comment-page-1/#comment-61781</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/?p=2591#comment-61781</guid>
		<description>Four thousand yrs is a water molecule in the swimming pool of geological time.  This coral colonial species has survived one climate change far larger than anything that presently has Al Gore&#039;s knickers in a knot.

That warming was only 1,000 yrs ago when Scotland was as warm as S. France.  Yes glaciers vanished, the Arctic sea opened up, the permafrost melted releasing tonnes of methane &amp; CO2, and polar bears did not go extinct.

Even THAT warming (very independent of human activity) did not bring the global climate UP to geological norms, which were closer to TEN degrees Celsius warmer than at present.

http://csccc.fcpp.org/files/f13.jpg

Perhaps this is the wrong venue for facts to be brought out, after all religion (which environmentalism now is)does not need fact.

&quot;Human caused effects&quot; are always being sought out by holier than thou, misanthropes masking as Green, Save-the-Planet activists and the &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Useful_idiots&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;useful idiots&lt;/a&gt;&quot; that believe them. [I tried an html link above rather than just presenting the URL, to see what happens.]

Consider what leading Environmentalists really think:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/744607/posts

And there, are a lot more than just that web page lists.  I have watched this nonsense since 1970 when a new anthropogenic Ice Age was impending because of human industry.  If you are under thirty, do your homework before you say another thing.  If you are over thirty and haven&#039;t figured it out, you are dishonest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Four thousand yrs is a water molecule in the swimming pool of geological time.  This coral colonial species has survived one climate change far larger than anything that presently has Al Gore&#8217;s knickers in a knot.</p>
<p>That warming was only 1,000 yrs ago when Scotland was as warm as S. France.  Yes glaciers vanished, the Arctic sea opened up, the permafrost melted releasing tonnes of methane &amp; CO2, and polar bears did not go extinct.</p>
<p>Even THAT warming (very independent of human activity) did not bring the global climate UP to geological norms, which were closer to TEN degrees Celsius warmer than at present.</p>
<p><a href="http://csccc.fcpp.org/files/f13.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://csccc.fcpp.org/files/f13.jpg</a></p>
<p>Perhaps this is the wrong venue for facts to be brought out, after all religion (which environmentalism now is)does not need fact.</p>
<p>&#8220;Human caused effects&#8221; are always being sought out by holier than thou, misanthropes masking as Green, Save-the-Planet activists and the &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Useful_idiots" rel="nofollow">useful idiots</a>&#8221; that believe them. [I tried an html link above rather than just presenting the URL, to see what happens.]</p>
<p>Consider what leading Environmentalists really think:<br />
<a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/744607/posts" rel="nofollow">http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/744607/posts</a></p>
<p>And there, are a lot more than just that web page lists.  I have watched this nonsense since 1970 when a new anthropogenic Ice Age was impending because of human industry.  If you are under thirty, do your homework before you say another thing.  If you are over thirty and haven&#8217;t figured it out, you are dishonest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: required</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/26/oldest-living-creature-discovered-at-4265-years-old/comment-page-1/#comment-61778</link>
		<dc:creator>required</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/?p=2591#comment-61778</guid>
		<description>human caused effects-- too many scientists doing survey research and dating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>human caused effects&#8211; too many scientists doing survey research and dating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: claudio</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/26/oldest-living-creature-discovered-at-4265-years-old/comment-page-1/#comment-61777</link>
		<dc:creator>claudio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/?p=2591#comment-61777</guid>
		<description>Are the coral &#039;living species in what regards&#039; ??
They seem rather different from terrestrial plants and animals.
Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the coral &#8216;living species in what regards&#8217; ??<br />
They seem rather different from terrestrial plants and animals.<br />
Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julianna Marriott</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/26/oldest-living-creature-discovered-at-4265-years-old/comment-page-1/#comment-61779</link>
		<dc:creator>Julianna Marriott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/?p=2591#comment-61779</guid>
		<description>UMMMMM, how did they radio carbon dat it without either killing or damaging It?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UMMMMM, how did they radio carbon dat it without either killing or damaging It?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Green</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/03/26/oldest-living-creature-discovered-at-4265-years-old/comment-page-1/#comment-61780</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 05:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/?p=2591#comment-61780</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing this bit of hope for the synergistic systems that keep our planet alive, and the beauty of nature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing this bit of hope for the synergistic systems that keep our planet alive, and the beauty of nature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

