<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back to School Week: UF Issues Alternative Transport Challenge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/08/25/back-to-school-week-uf-issues-alternative-transport-challenge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/08/25/back-to-school-week-uf-issues-alternative-transport-challenge/</link>
	<description>News &#38; commentary on sustainability, activism, urban planning, politics, and our world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:54:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roman</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/08/25/back-to-school-week-uf-issues-alternative-transport-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-2307</link>
		<dc:creator>Roman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecolocalizer.com/?p=548#comment-2307</guid>
		<description>I understand the basic rule that says you can&#039;t have less cars on the road, only fewer cars. But, to me, the expression isn&#039;t saying that. It&#039;s saying something different: If n= the number of cars on the road, the bike represents n-1. We are numerically down one, minus one or less one car. The avoidance of the few/many comparative terms is deliberate in this case because it would alter the meaning and impact of the expression. When you plaster a &quot;One Less Car&quot; sticker on a bike, the bike is the subject. &quot;One Fewer Car&quot; sounds wrong to my ear. &quot;One Car Fewer&quot; sounds better, but implies the road is the subject. The relationship between the subject and the object is now lost and it makes no sense. It&#039;s not a less vs. fewer issue, to wit &quot;One Less Traffic&quot; doesn&#039;t work either.

I think the grammarians should give us a pass here, because while &#039;less&#039; almost always means that you are making a comparison, it doesn&#039;t &lt;i&gt;necessarily&lt;/i&gt; mean a comparison. I could just mean subtraction for example.

Thanks for your comments. You have given me cause to reflect on this issue even more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand the basic rule that says you can&#8217;t have less cars on the road, only fewer cars. But, to me, the expression isn&#8217;t saying that. It&#8217;s saying something different: If n= the number of cars on the road, the bike represents n-1. We are numerically down one, minus one or less one car. The avoidance of the few/many comparative terms is deliberate in this case because it would alter the meaning and impact of the expression. When you plaster a &#8220;One Less Car&#8221; sticker on a bike, the bike is the subject. &#8220;One Fewer Car&#8221; sounds wrong to my ear. &#8220;One Car Fewer&#8221; sounds better, but implies the road is the subject. The relationship between the subject and the object is now lost and it makes no sense. It&#8217;s not a less vs. fewer issue, to wit &#8220;One Less Traffic&#8221; doesn&#8217;t work either.</p>
<p>I think the grammarians should give us a pass here, because while &#8216;less&#8217; almost always means that you are making a comparison, it doesn&#8217;t <i>necessarily</i> mean a comparison. I could just mean subtraction for example.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments. You have given me cause to reflect on this issue even more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shirley Siluk Gregory</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/08/25/back-to-school-week-uf-issues-alternative-transport-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-2304</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirley Siluk Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecolocalizer.com/?p=548#comment-2304</guid>
		<description>Sorry Roman, I&#039;ll have to disagree with you there : )

Here&#039;s an excerpt from the &quot;Fewer or Less?&quot; entry at &lt;a href=&quot;http://englishplus.com/grammar/00000214.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;englishplus.com&lt;/a&gt;:

&quot;Fewer or Less?

Use fewer with objects that can be counted one-by-one. &lt;i&gt;(My note: as with cars.)&lt;/i&gt;

Use less with qualities or quantities that cannot be individually counted.

    Incorrect: There were less days below freezing last winter.

    Correct: There were fewer days below freezing last winter.
    (Days can be counted.)

    Correct: I drank less water than she did.
    (Water cannot be counted individually here.)&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Roman, I&#8217;ll have to disagree with you there : )</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an excerpt from the &#8220;Fewer or Less?&#8221; entry at <a href="http://englishplus.com/grammar/00000214.htm" rel="nofollow">englishplus.com</a>:</p>
<p>&#8220;Fewer or Less?</p>
<p>Use fewer with objects that can be counted one-by-one. <i>(My note: as with cars.)</i></p>
<p>Use less with qualities or quantities that cannot be individually counted.</p>
<p>    Incorrect: There were less days below freezing last winter.</p>
<p>    Correct: There were fewer days below freezing last winter.<br />
    (Days can be counted.)</p>
<p>    Correct: I drank less water than she did.<br />
    (Water cannot be counted individually here.)&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roman</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/08/25/back-to-school-week-uf-issues-alternative-transport-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-2278</link>
		<dc:creator>Roman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecolocalizer.com/?p=548#comment-2278</guid>
		<description>I wish to defend the grammatical correctness of the slogan &#039;One less car&#039;. We are not making a comparison or saying that there are too many or few cars on the road. We are merely saying that a bicycle decrements that number by one. Cars come and go. Their numbers are in a state of flux, but at least I can say, there shall be &#039;one less&#039;. Your idea of using &quot;One Fewer Car Challenge&quot; doesn&#039;t make sense to me. How do you drive a fewer car? 
:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish to defend the grammatical correctness of the slogan &#8216;One less car&#8217;. We are not making a comparison or saying that there are too many or few cars on the road. We are merely saying that a bicycle decrements that number by one. Cars come and go. Their numbers are in a state of flux, but at least I can say, there shall be &#8216;one less&#8217;. Your idea of using &#8220;One Fewer Car Challenge&#8221; doesn&#8217;t make sense to me. How do you drive a fewer car?<br />
 <img src='http://c1ecolocalizercom.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

