<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US Public Has Zero Desire for Brazil&#8217;s Ethanol; Should It?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/07/30/us-public-has-zero-desire-for-brazils-ethanol-should-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/07/30/us-public-has-zero-desire-for-brazils-ethanol-should-it/</link>
	<description>News &#38; commentary on sustainability, activism, urban planning, politics, and our world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:32:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle B</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/07/30/us-public-has-zero-desire-for-brazils-ethanol-should-it/comment-page-1/#comment-54495</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/?p=1382#comment-54495</guid>
		<description>Raping other countries resources is not the answer, it is the problem! Our last President served big oil, not his country. He should be impeached for this treason. If the U.S. had chosen to be a moral people, and leaving Iraqi oil alone, and following Al Gore, decided to develop the South Western deserts, with the technology of the times - solar/thermal-molten sodium - electricity installations, for the same amount of money as that war cost, ($650 Billion), today, we would be tapping into the largest, renewable, sustainable, energy source the world has ever known. It would have paid every energy bill in the U.S.A. for maintenance fees only - FOREVER! It would be equivalent to an oil field that can NEVER run dry! Low cost electric power, and storeable hydrogen  gasoline replacement  from the electricity, for all! But: big oil wouldn&#039;t like that now would they!
After the millions of murders, and $650 billions of dollars, borrowed from our children’s futures and pissed away, with thousands of our own and others maimed and disfigured for life, millions of families utterly destroyed, ours and theirs, we are no closer to Iraqi oil production than the Iraqis are!
The next time you hear a blithering idiot spoiled brat, drunken, drug addicted, sociopath, rich  Arabic saber dancing  daddie’s boy oilman, stand at a microphone and threaten YOUR safety with someone ELSE’S weapons, remember what you lost America, remember, and weep! (also see  http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=a-solar-grand-plan)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raping other countries resources is not the answer, it is the problem! Our last President served big oil, not his country. He should be impeached for this treason. If the U.S. had chosen to be a moral people, and leaving Iraqi oil alone, and following Al Gore, decided to develop the South Western deserts, with the technology of the times &#8211; solar/thermal-molten sodium &#8211; electricity installations, for the same amount of money as that war cost, ($650 Billion), today, we would be tapping into the largest, renewable, sustainable, energy source the world has ever known. It would have paid every energy bill in the U.S.A. for maintenance fees only &#8211; FOREVER! It would be equivalent to an oil field that can NEVER run dry! Low cost electric power, and storeable hydrogen  gasoline replacement  from the electricity, for all! But: big oil wouldn&#8217;t like that now would they!<br />
After the millions of murders, and $650 billions of dollars, borrowed from our children’s futures and pissed away, with thousands of our own and others maimed and disfigured for life, millions of families utterly destroyed, ours and theirs, we are no closer to Iraqi oil production than the Iraqis are!<br />
The next time you hear a blithering idiot spoiled brat, drunken, drug addicted, sociopath, rich  Arabic saber dancing  daddie’s boy oilman, stand at a microphone and threaten YOUR safety with someone ELSE’S weapons, remember what you lost America, remember, and weep! (also see  <a href="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=a-solar-grand-plan" rel="nofollow">http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=a-solar-grand-plan</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/07/30/us-public-has-zero-desire-for-brazils-ethanol-should-it/comment-page-1/#comment-54493</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 06:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/?p=1382#comment-54493</guid>
		<description>Okay, politically speaking, I think the US should allow free trade import of Brazillian biodiesel grown from sugar. But the environmentalist in me winces at the idea. The electric automobile quest is booming, and so is the move to wind and solar power. It seems like we have the real potential to have an electric transportation infrastructure based on renewable power generation. So with this alternative, I find myself apposed to increased biofuel production that sometimes leads to deforestation, poor labor conditions in Brazil, the depletion of topsoil and pollution from the aggressive use of agricultural chemicals (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brightfuture.us/new/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=157&amp;Itemid=71&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;The Great Biofuel Hoax of 2008&quot;&lt;/a&gt;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, politically speaking, I think the US should allow free trade import of Brazillian biodiesel grown from sugar. But the environmentalist in me winces at the idea. The electric automobile quest is booming, and so is the move to wind and solar power. It seems like we have the real potential to have an electric transportation infrastructure based on renewable power generation. So with this alternative, I find myself apposed to increased biofuel production that sometimes leads to deforestation, poor labor conditions in Brazil, the depletion of topsoil and pollution from the aggressive use of agricultural chemicals (<a href="http://www.brightfuture.us/new/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=157&amp;Itemid=71" rel="nofollow">&#8220;The Great Biofuel Hoax of 2008&#8243;</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Peters</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/07/30/us-public-has-zero-desire-for-brazils-ethanol-should-it/comment-page-1/#comment-54494</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/?p=1382#comment-54494</guid>
		<description>Should a grand jury consider the cause of death of Alexander Farrell, 46, expert on alternative fuels?



http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/04/18/BAOK1087DP.DTL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should a grand jury consider the cause of death of Alexander Farrell, 46, expert on alternative fuels?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/04/18/BAOK1087DP.DTL" rel="nofollow">http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/04/18/BAOK1087DP.DTL</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

