<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nintendo: The Stylish Option</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/03/24/nintendo-the-stylish-option/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/03/24/nintendo-the-stylish-option/</link>
	<description>News &#38; commentary on sustainability, activism, urban planning, politics, and our world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:32:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EcoNinty</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/03/24/nintendo-the-stylish-option/comment-page-1/#comment-55160</link>
		<dc:creator>EcoNinty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 00:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/03/24/nintendo-the-stylish-option/#comment-55160</guid>
		<description>It is funny that Nintendo should be the game company targeted by Greenpeace. Interesting is a light term since Greenpeace is dead wrong on this one. For instance, nintendo&#039;s &quot;Wii&quot; console consumes less than 1/10 of the energy of the other current generation consoles (Xbox 360 and PS3) To boot, The Wii is the most compact and smallest of all the systems and is about 1/5 the size of the Xbox 360 or Playstation 3. Nintendo gets singled out for some hazardous plastics? Hardly seems fair seeing as they are the only company that even considered power consumption for their product. Go bother someone else Greenpeace and stop barking up the wrong tree. Yes, Nintendo should have some policy on &quot;toxics elimination&quot; but they more than make up for it with a far more energy efficient product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is funny that Nintendo should be the game company targeted by Greenpeace. Interesting is a light term since Greenpeace is dead wrong on this one. For instance, nintendo&#8217;s &#8220;Wii&#8221; console consumes less than 1/10 of the energy of the other current generation consoles (Xbox 360 and PS3) To boot, The Wii is the most compact and smallest of all the systems and is about 1/5 the size of the Xbox 360 or Playstation 3. Nintendo gets singled out for some hazardous plastics? Hardly seems fair seeing as they are the only company that even considered power consumption for their product. Go bother someone else Greenpeace and stop barking up the wrong tree. Yes, Nintendo should have some policy on &#8220;toxics elimination&#8221; but they more than make up for it with a far more energy efficient product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

