<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Asia&#8217;s Biodiesel Dilemma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/01/15/asias-biodiesel-dilemma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/01/15/asias-biodiesel-dilemma/</link>
	<description>News &#38; commentary on sustainability, activism, urban planning, politics, and our world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:32:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malaysia, Indonesia Will Pump Out 40% More Palm Oil Biodiesel : EcoWorldly</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/01/15/asias-biodiesel-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-53908</link>
		<dc:creator>Malaysia, Indonesia Will Pump Out 40% More Palm Oil Biodiesel : EcoWorldly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/01/15/asias-biodiesel-dilemma/#comment-53908</guid>
		<description>[...] January, EcoWorldly took an in-depth look at Asia’s Biodiesel Dilemma, where we listed some of the ecological pros and cons of palm oil [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] January, EcoWorldly took an in-depth look at Asia’s Biodiesel Dilemma, where we listed some of the ecological pros and cons of palm oil [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Korea to Decrease CO2 Emissions with the &#8216;Act on Climate Change&#8217; : EcoWorldly</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/01/15/asias-biodiesel-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-53907</link>
		<dc:creator>Korea to Decrease CO2 Emissions with the &#8216;Act on Climate Change&#8217; : EcoWorldly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 00:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/01/15/asias-biodiesel-dilemma/#comment-53907</guid>
		<description>[...] Biodeisel&#8211;mostly from palm oil&#8211;will also be mixed into fuel in increased quantities, from 0.5% in 2007 to 3% in 2012. An initial increase of up to 5% was proposed, but not adopted. Palm biodeisel has its own environmental dark side, but a new regulatory body has been established in Malaysia to help ensure its sustainability, as discussed here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Biodeisel&#8211;mostly from palm oil&#8211;will also be mixed into fuel in increased quantities, from 0.5% in 2007 to 3% in 2012. An initial increase of up to 5% was proposed, but not adopted. Palm biodeisel has its own environmental dark side, but a new regulatory body has been established in Malaysia to help ensure its sustainability, as discussed here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F. Law</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/01/15/asias-biodiesel-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-53906</link>
		<dc:creator>F. Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 08:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/01/15/asias-biodiesel-dilemma/#comment-53906</guid>
		<description>Fair article.  Well researched.  A refreshing departure from the usual crap against palm oil dredged up by &quot;environmental&quot; organizations.

The three short paras in which you clinically dissected the counter arguments is so succinct that I think should be requoted here:

&quot;Some environmental organizations link palm oil biofuels to deforestation. Greenpeace, for one, staunchly opposes palm oil as a source of biofuel based on this concern. The Center for Science in the Public Interest also stands firmly against palm oil, warning that it “harms health [when eaten], the rainforest and wildlife.”

It’s a funny situation: usually environmental and social groups lobby for alternatives to fossil fuels while oil companies and major international financial institutions continue with their business as usual production of those fuels. Here, the environmental groups are lobbying against the alternatives to fossil fuels that oil producers and the World Bank are pushing for.

To the protests from environmental groups, pro-palm oil organizations have several convincing responses. Firstly, they point out that oil palms are some of the most productive biofuel sources in the world. One hectare of oil palm plantation is enough to produce 5 metric tons of crude biodiesel a year. This means less land is required to produce biofuel this way. The Palm Oil Truth Foundation also argues that “in Malaysia, the expansion of oil palm plantations over the last decade came mostly from the conversion of other economic crops such as rubber, cocoa and coconut” and not from deforestation. The total amount of greenhouse gases reduced by palm oil biodiesel, claim proponents, is 40-60% over regular diesel.&quot;

I&#039;ve lived in Malaysia for the past 25 years and I can vouch for the fact that the deforestation claims are false.

Despite more than a hundred years of planting to earn its ranking as the world&#039;s largest producer of palm oil, Malaysia can still boast of forest cover of 65%, MUCH MUCH HIGHER THAN THE 20%  prevailing in ALL the countries of the industrial West!  That&#039;s down to the fact that palm oil is the most productive of all the oil seeds yielding more than 4,500 metric tons of oil per hectare. (much higher than the 500 metric tons typically yielded by the competing oil seeds).  In view of its high yield palm oil in Malaysia is typically planted on legitimate agricultural land and for decades now, there is really no necessity to cut down jungle to plant palm oil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair article.  Well researched.  A refreshing departure from the usual crap against palm oil dredged up by &#8220;environmental&#8221; organizations.</p>
<p>The three short paras in which you clinically dissected the counter arguments is so succinct that I think should be requoted here:</p>
<p>&#8220;Some environmental organizations link palm oil biofuels to deforestation. Greenpeace, for one, staunchly opposes palm oil as a source of biofuel based on this concern. The Center for Science in the Public Interest also stands firmly against palm oil, warning that it “harms health [when eaten], the rainforest and wildlife.”</p>
<p>It’s a funny situation: usually environmental and social groups lobby for alternatives to fossil fuels while oil companies and major international financial institutions continue with their business as usual production of those fuels. Here, the environmental groups are lobbying against the alternatives to fossil fuels that oil producers and the World Bank are pushing for.</p>
<p>To the protests from environmental groups, pro-palm oil organizations have several convincing responses. Firstly, they point out that oil palms are some of the most productive biofuel sources in the world. One hectare of oil palm plantation is enough to produce 5 metric tons of crude biodiesel a year. This means less land is required to produce biofuel this way. The Palm Oil Truth Foundation also argues that “in Malaysia, the expansion of oil palm plantations over the last decade came mostly from the conversion of other economic crops such as rubber, cocoa and coconut” and not from deforestation. The total amount of greenhouse gases reduced by palm oil biodiesel, claim proponents, is 40-60% over regular diesel.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve lived in Malaysia for the past 25 years and I can vouch for the fact that the deforestation claims are false.</p>
<p>Despite more than a hundred years of planting to earn its ranking as the world&#8217;s largest producer of palm oil, Malaysia can still boast of forest cover of 65%, MUCH MUCH HIGHER THAN THE 20%  prevailing in ALL the countries of the industrial West!  That&#8217;s down to the fact that palm oil is the most productive of all the oil seeds yielding more than 4,500 metric tons of oil per hectare. (much higher than the 500 metric tons typically yielded by the competing oil seeds).  In view of its high yield palm oil in Malaysia is typically planted on legitimate agricultural land and for decades now, there is really no necessity to cut down jungle to plant palm oil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Scott</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/01/15/asias-biodiesel-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-53905</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 06:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/01/15/asias-biodiesel-dilemma/#comment-53905</guid>
		<description>Excellent post.  Well thought out, objectively written and presented.  A far cry from the hype and dishonest arguments so often put forth against palm oil by the likes of Greenpeace and the Center for Science (CSPI) in the Public Interest.

People are beginning to wake up to the fact that something malodorous and sinister lies beneath the surface of these dubious attacks against palm oil.

It will be people like you Gavin, with your critical and analytical mind that&#039;ll eventually expose environmental outfits like Greenpeace and CSPI for the humbugs that they really are!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post.  Well thought out, objectively written and presented.  A far cry from the hype and dishonest arguments so often put forth against palm oil by the likes of Greenpeace and the Center for Science (CSPI) in the Public Interest.</p>
<p>People are beginning to wake up to the fact that something malodorous and sinister lies beneath the surface of these dubious attacks against palm oil.</p>
<p>It will be people like you Gavin, with your critical and analytical mind that&#8217;ll eventually expose environmental outfits like Greenpeace and CSPI for the humbugs that they really are!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b cole</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/01/15/asias-biodiesel-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-53904</link>
		<dc:creator>b cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/01/15/asias-biodiesel-dilemma/#comment-53904</guid>
		<description>National Algae Association

Algae: The Next Biofuel

Inaugural

Algae Commercialization
Business Plan and Networking Forum

April 10, 2008

www.nationalalgaeassociation.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>National Algae Association</p>
<p>Algae: The Next Biofuel</p>
<p>Inaugural</p>
<p>Algae Commercialization<br />
Business Plan and Networking Forum</p>
<p>April 10, 2008</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nationalalgaeassociation.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.nationalalgaeassociation.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Hudson</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/01/15/asias-biodiesel-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-53903</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Hudson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 06:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/01/15/asias-biodiesel-dilemma/#comment-53903</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the responses. I think it&#039;s a good topic to discuss. Certainly, we can&#039;t keep using oil (both because of pollution and peak oil). Therefore, if we&#039;re going to stick with personal transportation (cars, trucks, etc.) rather than convert to a fully integrated public transit system (light rail trains and electric buses like those in San Francisco, for example), we&#039;ll have to find an alternative to fossil fuels.

I found the Roundtable of Sustainable Palm Oil certification program a very encouraging option for sustainably produced biodiesel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the responses. I think it&#8217;s a good topic to discuss. Certainly, we can&#8217;t keep using oil (both because of pollution and peak oil). Therefore, if we&#8217;re going to stick with personal transportation (cars, trucks, etc.) rather than convert to a fully integrated public transit system (light rail trains and electric buses like those in San Francisco, for example), we&#8217;ll have to find an alternative to fossil fuels.</p>
<p>I found the Roundtable of Sustainable Palm Oil certification program a very encouraging option for sustainably produced biodiesel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hurst</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/01/15/asias-biodiesel-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-53900</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Hurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 01:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/01/15/asias-biodiesel-dilemma/#comment-53900</guid>
		<description>Nice work, Gavin. I don&#039;t know if my Masters&#039; thesis had that many sources! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work, Gavin. I don&#8217;t know if my Masters&#8217; thesis had that many sources! <img src='http://c1ecolocalizercom.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noelle</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/01/15/asias-biodiesel-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-53901</link>
		<dc:creator>Noelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/01/15/asias-biodiesel-dilemma/#comment-53901</guid>
		<description>Environmentalist who oppose Palm Oil would rather use fossil fuels -- or simply don&#039;t see it as an alternative resource because it does damage as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Environmentalist who oppose Palm Oil would rather use fossil fuels &#8212; or simply don&#8217;t see it as an alternative resource because it does damage as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel M.</title>
		<link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/01/15/asias-biodiesel-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-53902</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/01/15/asias-biodiesel-dilemma/#comment-53902</guid>
		<description>Great post, Gavin.  The references are especially helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Gavin.  The references are especially helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

